<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 169 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271464</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263, directing the AO to reassess the income after making necessary inquiries and verifications regarding the provisions for warranty, liquidated damages, sales tax, and excise duty. The Tribunal also dismissed the appeal filed directly before it against the order passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 263, advising the assessee to approach the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 169 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271464</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263, directing the AO to reassess the income after making necessary inquiries and verifications regarding the provisions for warranty, liquidated damages, sales tax, and excise duty. The Tribunal also dismissed the appeal filed directly before it against the order passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 263, advising the assessee to approach the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>