<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 160 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271455</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision, ruling that the rental income from the letting of the building with amenities should be classified as composite rental income under &quot;Income from Other Sources&quot; as per Section 56(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the deduction under Section 24(a) was deemed inapplicable. The revenue&#039;s appeal was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 06:15:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 160 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271455</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision, ruling that the rental income from the letting of the building with amenities should be classified as composite rental income under &quot;Income from Other Sources&quot; as per Section 56(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the deduction under Section 24(a) was deemed inapplicable. The revenue&#039;s appeal was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>