<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 153 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271448</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, remanding the matter to the AO for fresh consideration. The judgment emphasized the retrospective application of the amendment to Section 40(a)(ia) by the Finance Act, 2012, to avoid unjust enrichment and ensure fair tax treatment. The AO was directed to verify tax payments by recipients and provide the assessee with an opportunity to present evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 06:15:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 153 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271448</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, remanding the matter to the AO for fresh consideration. The judgment emphasized the retrospective application of the amendment to Section 40(a)(ia) by the Finance Act, 2012, to avoid unjust enrichment and ensure fair tax treatment. The AO was directed to verify tax payments by recipients and provide the assessee with an opportunity to present evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>