<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 139 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271434</link>
    <description>Where the Customs House Agent licensing regulations prescribe mandatory timelines for notice, inquiry and final revocation, non-compliance with those deadlines invalidates the disciplinary action. The inquiry report was submitted more than twenty-two months after the show-cause notice, far beyond the ninety-day period contemplated by Regulation 22. Applying the settled view that breach of the prescribed schedule renders revocation unsustainable, the Tribunal held that the licence revocation could not stand and quashed the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 06:07:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 139 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271434</link>
      <description>Where the Customs House Agent licensing regulations prescribe mandatory timelines for notice, inquiry and final revocation, non-compliance with those deadlines invalidates the disciplinary action. The inquiry report was submitted more than twenty-two months after the show-cause notice, far beyond the ninety-day period contemplated by Regulation 22. Applying the settled view that breach of the prescribed schedule renders revocation unsustainable, the Tribunal held that the licence revocation could not stand and quashed the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>