https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271429 The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff on the issues of trademark ownership, breach of fiduciary duties, and the maintainability of the derivative action. Interim relief was granted, restraining defendant No.1 from using the "PARAMOUNT" name and engaging in a competing business. The court emphasized the importance of upholding fiduciary duties and protecting the interests of the company. The detailed analysis covered legal principles and evidence, providing a comprehensive basis for the judgment. en-us Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Feb 2016 06:06:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271429 The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff on the issues of trademark ownership, breach of fiduciary duties, and the maintainability of the derivative action. Interim relief was granted, restraining defendant No.1 from using the "PARAMOUNT" name and engaging in a competing business. The court emphasized the importance of upholding fiduciary duties and protecting the interests of the company. The detailed analysis covered legal principles and evidence, providing a comprehensive basis for the judgment. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271429