<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 495 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178431</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961, against the assessees for intentional concealment of income in their original returns, despite voluntary disclosure in revised returns. The Tribunal deemed the revised returns non est, as they were filed post-enquiry initiation. The High Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s findings were not perverse and no substantial question of law was involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 495 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178431</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961, against the assessees for intentional concealment of income in their original returns, despite voluntary disclosure in revised returns. The Tribunal deemed the revised returns non est, as they were filed post-enquiry initiation. The High Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s findings were not perverse and no substantial question of law was involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>