<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 1024 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178423</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and partly allowed the assessees&#039; appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the penalty under section 271(1)(c) at the minimum rate for the amounts deemed to be concealed income. The Tribunal held that the assessees were deemed to have concealed their income to the extent of the amounts specified in their declarations during the search.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 14:33:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 1024 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178423</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and partly allowed the assessees&#039; appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the penalty under section 271(1)(c) at the minimum rate for the amounts deemed to be concealed income. The Tribunal held that the assessees were deemed to have concealed their income to the extent of the amounts specified in their declarations during the search.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>