<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1700 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178401</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with specific issues restored to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) and Assessing Officer (AO) for further verification and appropriate relief. The tribunal emphasized the importance of properly appreciating evidence and adhering to safe harbor provisions in transfer pricing adjustments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:06:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1700 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178401</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with specific issues restored to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) and Assessing Officer (AO) for further verification and appropriate relief. The tribunal emphasized the importance of properly appreciating evidence and adhering to safe harbor provisions in transfer pricing adjustments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>