<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1036 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178408</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to restrict the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) adjustment to purchases from the Associated Enterprises (AE) and to reassess the benefit under section 92C(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer was instructed to seek assistance from the Transfer Pricing Officer if needed and to ensure consistency in applying the benefit across different segments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:06:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1036 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178408</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to restrict the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) adjustment to purchases from the Associated Enterprises (AE) and to reassess the benefit under section 92C(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer was instructed to seek assistance from the Transfer Pricing Officer if needed and to ensure consistency in applying the benefit across different segments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>