<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 130 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271425</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the notice seeking to reopen the assessment for Assessment Year 2010-11 as the income chargeable to tax had not genuinely escaped assessment. The court emphasized that the service tax component was not chargeable to tax as per the CBDT circular and the Assessing Officer&#039;s reasoning. Therefore, there was no valid reason for reopening the assessment. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:03:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 130 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271425</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the notice seeking to reopen the assessment for Assessment Year 2010-11 as the income chargeable to tax had not genuinely escaped assessment. The court emphasized that the service tax component was not chargeable to tax as per the CBDT circular and the Assessing Officer&#039;s reasoning. Therefore, there was no valid reason for reopening the assessment. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>