<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 112 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271407</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the AO&#039;s 2006 order as it lacked jurisdiction due to the finality of previous proceedings that were not overturned by the High Court. The legal intricacies surrounding the validity of the order in light of the High Court&#039;s directives were analyzed, emphasizing the importance of adherence to jurisdictional boundaries for a fair resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:01:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 112 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271407</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the AO&#039;s 2006 order as it lacked jurisdiction due to the finality of previous proceedings that were not overturned by the High Court. The legal intricacies surrounding the validity of the order in light of the High Court&#039;s directives were analyzed, emphasizing the importance of adherence to jurisdictional boundaries for a fair resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>