<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 106 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271401</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of short paid cost recovery charges against the appellant, a 100% Exported Oriented Undertaking in the telecom equipment manufacturing sector. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument of not opting for the cost recovery scheme and preferring the Merchant Over Time Scheme, the Tribunal considered past payments under the cost recovery scheme and the outstanding amount due, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The decision favored the Revenue, emphasizing compliance with statutory obligations regarding cost recovery charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:00:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 106 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271401</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of short paid cost recovery charges against the appellant, a 100% Exported Oriented Undertaking in the telecom equipment manufacturing sector. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument of not opting for the cost recovery scheme and preferring the Merchant Over Time Scheme, the Tribunal considered past payments under the cost recovery scheme and the outstanding amount due, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The decision favored the Revenue, emphasizing compliance with statutory obligations regarding cost recovery charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>