<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 104 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271399</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellant and rejecting the penalty imposed on the partner of the assessee. The judgment emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence, corroboration, and fair procedures such as cross-examination to establish allegations of clandestine removal effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2016 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 104 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271399</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellant and rejecting the penalty imposed on the partner of the assessee. The judgment emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence, corroboration, and fair procedures such as cross-examination to establish allegations of clandestine removal effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>