<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 29 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2163</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court concluded that the hot air generator manufactured by the assessee should be classified as &quot;air heaters&quot; under Heading 73.22 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Court emphasized that resorting to the HSN Explanatory Note was unnecessary as the explicit reference to air heaters in Heading 73.22 left no ambiguity. The appeals challenging the classification were dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 29 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2163</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court concluded that the hot air generator manufactured by the assessee should be classified as &quot;air heaters&quot; under Heading 73.22 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Court emphasized that resorting to the HSN Explanatory Note was unnecessary as the explicit reference to air heaters in Heading 73.22 left no ambiguity. The appeals challenging the classification were dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>