<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 966 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178392</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, deleting the additions related to long term capital gain and commission payment. The decision was based on the lack of direct evidence against the assessee and previous judgments confirming similar transactions as genuine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 966 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178392</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, deleting the additions related to long term capital gain and commission payment. The decision was based on the lack of direct evidence against the assessee and previous judgments confirming similar transactions as genuine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>