<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 627 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178389</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 12,50,000 made by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act for a fine paid under the Gujarat Regulation and Unauthorized Development Act, 2001. The Tribunal held that the payment was compensatory in nature and eligible for deduction under section 37(1) based on precedents, despite the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion being dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 17:20:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 627 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178389</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 12,50,000 made by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act for a fine paid under the Gujarat Regulation and Unauthorized Development Act, 2001. The Tribunal held that the payment was compensatory in nature and eligible for deduction under section 37(1) based on precedents, despite the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion being dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>