<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 608 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178386</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and holding that the gratuity payment should be considered as paid within the meaning of the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act. The appellant&#039;s contention regarding the transfer of liability to the new employer being equivalent to payment was accepted, leading to the allowance of the deduction claimed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 17:07:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 608 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178386</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and holding that the gratuity payment should be considered as paid within the meaning of the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act. The appellant&#039;s contention regarding the transfer of liability to the new employer being equivalent to payment was accepted, leading to the allowance of the deduction claimed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>