<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 626 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178381</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the amount received on account of forfeiture of shares should be treated as a capital receipt, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. However, the Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling on the timeliness of the notice issued under section 148, allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on this point. The appeal was partially allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 626 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178381</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the amount received on account of forfeiture of shares should be treated as a capital receipt, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. However, the Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling on the timeliness of the notice issued under section 148, allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on this point. The appeal was partially allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>