<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 942 - DELHI  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178375</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision regarding the payment of commission, emphasizing the genuineness of the transactions and lack of evidence to prove them as non-genuine. The Court also ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance under Section 14A, stating that there was no evidence to support the expenditure being incurred to earn exempted income. As a result, the Court found no substantial questions of law and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 14:35:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 942 - DELHI  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178375</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision regarding the payment of commission, emphasizing the genuineness of the transactions and lack of evidence to prove them as non-genuine. The Court also ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance under Section 14A, stating that there was no evidence to support the expenditure being incurred to earn exempted income. As a result, the Court found no substantial questions of law and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>