<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 625 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178369</link>
    <description>Reimbursement of salary paid for a seconded employee was not liable for tax deduction at source under section 195 where the salary had already been taxed in India in the employee&#039;s hands. The secondment arrangement was treated as a remittance of salary cost, not as consideration for technical services, so the same amount could not again be characterised as fees for technical services. As no separate withholding obligation arose on the reimbursement, the assessee was not an assessee in default under sections 201(1) and 201(1A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2017 09:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 625 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178369</link>
      <description>Reimbursement of salary paid for a seconded employee was not liable for tax deduction at source under section 195 where the salary had already been taxed in India in the employee&#039;s hands. The secondment arrangement was treated as a remittance of salary cost, not as consideration for technical services, so the same amount could not again be characterised as fees for technical services. As no separate withholding obligation arose on the reimbursement, the assessee was not an assessee in default under sections 201(1) and 201(1A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>