<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 439 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178368</link>
    <description>Interest on excess levy sugar price was treated as deductible under the Levy Sugar Price Equalisation Fund Act, as amended, where the statutory scheme under sections 3 and 5A was satisfied and binding precedent applied. The note also states that no disallowance of notional interest was warranted on advances to subsidiaries merely because the assessee had not charged interest from them, again following binding precedent. On both issues, the referred questions were answered for the assessee and the revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 13:03:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 439 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178368</link>
      <description>Interest on excess levy sugar price was treated as deductible under the Levy Sugar Price Equalisation Fund Act, as amended, where the statutory scheme under sections 3 and 5A was satisfied and binding precedent applied. The note also states that no disallowance of notional interest was warranted on advances to subsidiaries merely because the assessee had not charged interest from them, again following binding precedent. On both issues, the referred questions were answered for the assessee and the revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>