<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 439 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178368</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. It held that interest on excess levy sugar price is an allowable deduction and that the disallowance of interest on advances to subsidiaries is not warranted when no interest was charged. The Court concluded that the Tribunal&#039;s decisions were consistent with precedent, answering the questions in favor of the assessee without awarding any costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 13:03:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 439 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178368</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. It held that interest on excess levy sugar price is an allowable deduction and that the disallowance of interest on advances to subsidiaries is not warranted when no interest was charged. The Court concluded that the Tribunal&#039;s decisions were consistent with precedent, answering the questions in favor of the assessee without awarding any costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>