<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 80 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271375</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order allowing full deduction of salary expenses and depreciation on office equipment. The ITAT upheld that once the business is established, related expenditures are deductible, regardless of manufacturing commencement. Judicial precedents supported this view, leading to the conclusion that all expenses were rightly allowed. The ITAT found no issues with the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and upheld it entirely.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 06:51:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 80 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271375</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order allowing full deduction of salary expenses and depreciation on office equipment. The ITAT upheld that once the business is established, related expenditures are deductible, regardless of manufacturing commencement. Judicial precedents supported this view, leading to the conclusion that all expenses were rightly allowed. The ITAT found no issues with the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and upheld it entirely.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>