<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 76 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271371</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed with specific issues remanded back to the AO for further verification and adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistent accounting practices and proper recognition of income and expenses. Notably, the decision to treat the entire upfront premium as income in the year of receipt was upheld due to the absence of further obligations by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 06:51:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 76 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271371</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed with specific issues remanded back to the AO for further verification and adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistent accounting practices and proper recognition of income and expenses. Notably, the decision to treat the entire upfront premium as income in the year of receipt was upheld due to the absence of further obligations by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>