<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 114 -  CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2151</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a dispute over the assessable value of goods manufactured for Hindustan Lever. The Tribunal aligned with a Supreme Court decision, accepting the sale price as the assessable value, rejecting the Adjudicating Commissioner&#039;s valuation based on balance sheet value. The Tribunal found no evidence of free supplies and confirmed transactions were on a principal-to-principal basis. The Department&#039;s failure to justify the differing treatment of appellants compared to other suppliers led to the appeal being allowed, with consequential benefits granted to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 114 -  CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2151</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a dispute over the assessable value of goods manufactured for Hindustan Lever. The Tribunal aligned with a Supreme Court decision, accepting the sale price as the assessable value, rejecting the Adjudicating Commissioner&#039;s valuation based on balance sheet value. The Tribunal found no evidence of free supplies and confirmed transactions were on a principal-to-principal basis. The Department&#039;s failure to justify the differing treatment of appellants compared to other suppliers led to the appeal being allowed, with consequential benefits granted to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>