https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271368 The High Court allowed the exemption application (CM APPL No. 2159 of 2016) subject to exceptions, and disposed of the application. The delay in filing the appeal (CM APPL No. 2158 of 2016) was condoned, and the court disposed of the delay application. Regarding the appeal against the CESTAT order (SERTA 3 of 2016 & CM No. 2157 of 2016), the High Court directed the Appellant, a PSU, to consolidate all issues in the appeal against the Assistant Commissioner's order. The Appellate Authority was instructed to assess the refund claim's merits and resolve the matter within three months. Ultimately, the appeal and related applications were disposed of as per the High Court's directions. en-us Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Feb 2016 06:50:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271368 The High Court allowed the exemption application (CM APPL No. 2159 of 2016) subject to exceptions, and disposed of the application. The delay in filing the appeal (CM APPL No. 2158 of 2016) was condoned, and the court disposed of the delay application. Regarding the appeal against the CESTAT order (SERTA 3 of 2016 & CM No. 2157 of 2016), the High Court directed the Appellant, a PSU, to consolidate all issues in the appeal against the Assistant Commissioner's order. The Appellate Authority was instructed to assess the refund claim's merits and resolve the matter within three months. Ultimately, the appeal and related applications were disposed of as per the High Court's directions. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271368