<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 64 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271359</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to avail cenvat credit on services provided by foreign commission agents. The demand raised by the department was considered time-barred due to the lack of suppression of material facts by the appellant. The appellant&#039;s compliance with notification provisions was upheld, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 15:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 64 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271359</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to avail cenvat credit on services provided by foreign commission agents. The demand raised by the department was considered time-barred due to the lack of suppression of material facts by the appellant. The appellant&#039;s compliance with notification provisions was upheld, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>