<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 61 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271356</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declined to entertain a Central Excise appeal because the tax effect was low, and dismissed the appeal solely on that ground. No substantive issue on liability or classification was decided, as the order turned entirely on the monetary threshold for maintaining the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 06:49:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 61 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271356</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declined to entertain a Central Excise appeal because the tax effect was low, and dismissed the appeal solely on that ground. No substantive issue on liability or classification was decided, as the order turned entirely on the monetary threshold for maintaining the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>