<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 59 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271354</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found that the dispute had been decided on factual findings already addressed below and that no question of law arose for consideration. As the controversy turned entirely on factual determination, the Court declined to entertain any further legal adjudication and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 06:49:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 59 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271354</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found that the dispute had been decided on factual findings already addressed below and that no question of law arose for consideration. As the controversy turned entirely on factual determination, the Court declined to entertain any further legal adjudication and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>