<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 53 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271348</link>
    <description>The appeal by the Revenue against OIA No. 12/SLG/2012 was disposed of by the Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the first appellate authority&#039;s decision, except for the calculators of foreign origin, which were found liable for confiscation under Sec 123 of the Customs Act 1962. The goods, other than the calculators, were to be returned to the appellant. The matter regarding the calculators was remanded to the adjudicating authority for imposing a redemption fine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 53 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271348</link>
      <description>The appeal by the Revenue against OIA No. 12/SLG/2012 was disposed of by the Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the first appellate authority&#039;s decision, except for the calculators of foreign origin, which were found liable for confiscation under Sec 123 of the Customs Act 1962. The goods, other than the calculators, were to be returned to the appellant. The matter regarding the calculators was remanded to the adjudicating authority for imposing a redemption fine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>