<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 72 -  CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2142</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellants for wrong availment of CENVAT credit under Rule 15 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The tribunal held that since the demand and interest had been paid before the show-cause notice was issued, the penalty was not justified. The tribunal found that the penalty should have been vacated based on the case law cited by the appellants, leading to the appeal being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 72 -  CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2142</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellants for wrong availment of CENVAT credit under Rule 15 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The tribunal held that since the demand and interest had been paid before the show-cause notice was issued, the penalty was not justified. The tribunal found that the penalty should have been vacated based on the case law cited by the appellants, leading to the appeal being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>