https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178327 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's Miscellaneous Application, stating that the issues raised were already pending before the High Court and did not constitute mistakes apparent on record that could be rectified under Section 254(2). The Tribunal held that it lacked the jurisdiction to review its order, citing the Special Bench decision in Tata Communications Ltd. vs. JCIT. en-us Thu, 19 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178327 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's Miscellaneous Application, stating that the issues raised were already pending before the High Court and did not constitute mistakes apparent on record that could be rectified under Section 254(2). The Tribunal held that it lacked the jurisdiction to review its order, citing the Special Bench decision in Tata Communications Ltd. vs. JCIT. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 19 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178327