https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178318 A discretionary order in execution proceedings granting judgment debtors further time to make the statutory deposit under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC for setting aside an auction sale will ordinarily not be disturbed under Article 136. Where the recalculated amount is found correct and the relief is exercised to prevent loss of property in long-pending execution proceedings, appellate interference is unwarranted unless illegality, perversity, or a clear error of law or jurisdiction is shown. In the absence of any substantial question justifying interference, the order remains undisturbed. en-us Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Feb 2016 11:37:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178318 A discretionary order in execution proceedings granting judgment debtors further time to make the statutory deposit under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC for setting aside an auction sale will ordinarily not be disturbed under Article 136. Where the recalculated amount is found correct and the relief is exercised to prevent loss of property in long-pending execution proceedings, appellate interference is unwarranted unless illegality, perversity, or a clear error of law or jurisdiction is shown. In the absence of any substantial question justifying interference, the order remains undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178318