<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 790 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178311</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the challenge to the validity of the assessment order due to the timing of the notice under section 143(2) but ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the classification of gains from the transfer of shares. The gains were to be treated as capital gains (both short-term and long-term) rather than business income, based on factors such as the intention of purchase, source of funds, and past treatment by tax authorities. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 10:43:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 790 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178311</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the challenge to the validity of the assessment order due to the timing of the notice under section 143(2) but ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the classification of gains from the transfer of shares. The gains were to be treated as capital gains (both short-term and long-term) rather than business income, based on factors such as the intention of purchase, source of funds, and past treatment by tax authorities. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>