<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1554 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178310</link>
    <description>Cross-border sales and marketing payments to Marriott International, including expense reimbursements, were treated as not chargeable to tax in India because the services were rendered outside India and the treaty&#039;s make-available condition for technical services was not satisfied, so deduction at source and disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) were not sustainable. Inventory valuation was required to follow the settled cost-or-net-realisable-value, whichever is lower, principle under ordinary commercial accounting and section 145; the High Court compromise price was not treated as open-market value, so the closing stock addition was upheld. The opening stock of the succeeding year was correspondingly to be adjusted to match the revised closing stock.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1554 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178310</link>
      <description>Cross-border sales and marketing payments to Marriott International, including expense reimbursements, were treated as not chargeable to tax in India because the services were rendered outside India and the treaty&#039;s make-available condition for technical services was not satisfied, so deduction at source and disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) were not sustainable. Inventory valuation was required to follow the settled cost-or-net-realisable-value, whichever is lower, principle under ordinary commercial accounting and section 145; the High Court compromise price was not treated as open-market value, so the closing stock addition was upheld. The opening stock of the succeeding year was correspondingly to be adjusted to match the revised closing stock.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>