<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1061 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178302</link>
    <description>The court favored the petitioner by setting aside the show-cause notice and original order due to the lack of wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. The court upheld the petitioner&#039;s classification of goods and allowed the writ petition based on this finding, despite the revenue&#039;s arguments. The court concluded that the challenge succeeded, setting aside the show-cause notice and original order, and allowing the writ petition to the extent mentioned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 10:15:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1061 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178302</link>
      <description>The court favored the petitioner by setting aside the show-cause notice and original order due to the lack of wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. The court upheld the petitioner&#039;s classification of goods and allowed the writ petition based on this finding, despite the revenue&#039;s arguments. The court concluded that the challenge succeeded, setting aside the show-cause notice and original order, and allowing the writ petition to the extent mentioned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>