<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 932 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178306</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the brokerage expenses claimed by the assessee as deductible under Section 48(i) of the Income Tax Act, finding them justified and incurred wholly and exclusively for the land transfer. The Tribunal upheld the addition of unexplained jewelry, as the assessee failed to provide evidence supporting the claim. As a result, ITA No.1358/PN/2013 was dismissed, while all other appeals filed by the respective assessees were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 10:15:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 932 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178306</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the brokerage expenses claimed by the assessee as deductible under Section 48(i) of the Income Tax Act, finding them justified and incurred wholly and exclusively for the land transfer. The Tribunal upheld the addition of unexplained jewelry, as the assessee failed to provide evidence supporting the claim. As a result, ITA No.1358/PN/2013 was dismissed, while all other appeals filed by the respective assessees were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>