<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 41 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271336</link>
    <description>The Court directed that there should be no coercive recovery of the penalty demand pending the petitioner&#039;s appeal against the penalty order. The Court expressed doubts on the imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, considering the nature of the petitioner&#039;s activities and eligibility for tax exemption. It emphasized the need for a comprehensive assessment before enforcing penalties and disposed of the petition without hindering the department&#039;s defense of the penalty order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 10:13:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 41 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271336</link>
      <description>The Court directed that there should be no coercive recovery of the penalty demand pending the petitioner&#039;s appeal against the penalty order. The Court expressed doubts on the imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, considering the nature of the petitioner&#039;s activities and eligibility for tax exemption. It emphasized the need for a comprehensive assessment before enforcing penalties and disposed of the petition without hindering the department&#039;s defense of the penalty order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>