<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 33 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271328</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the disallowance of expenditure under Section 14A and upheld the application of Rule 8D for computing expenses related to exempt income. It found that the AO&#039;s satisfaction was duly recorded, justifying the disallowance, and interpreted Section 14A(3) to support the application of Rule 8D in such cases. The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the disallowance of Rs. 1,21,805 for expenditure incurred for earning exempt income was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 10:13:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 33 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271328</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the disallowance of expenditure under Section 14A and upheld the application of Rule 8D for computing expenses related to exempt income. It found that the AO&#039;s satisfaction was duly recorded, justifying the disallowance, and interpreted Section 14A(3) to support the application of Rule 8D in such cases. The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the disallowance of Rs. 1,21,805 for expenditure incurred for earning exempt income was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>