<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 29 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271324</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the shop in Lucknow should not be included in taxable wealth as it qualifies as a commercial establishment. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the CWT(A)&#039;s decision that certain properties in Kolkata were part of the stock-in-trade and exempt from wealth tax. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 10:12:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 29 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271324</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the shop in Lucknow should not be included in taxable wealth as it qualifies as a commercial establishment. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the CWT(A)&#039;s decision that certain properties in Kolkata were part of the stock-in-trade and exempt from wealth tax. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>