<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 15 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271310</link>
    <description>In a Central Excise review matter, the SC held that it found no error, much less an apparent error, in the earlier order dismissing the civil appeal and therefore dismissed the review petition. The order confirms that review jurisdiction is limited to correcting patent mistakes on the face of the record and does not permit rehearing of the concluded matter. No further relief was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 18:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 15 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271310</link>
      <description>In a Central Excise review matter, the SC held that it found no error, much less an apparent error, in the earlier order dismissing the civil appeal and therefore dismissed the review petition. The order confirms that review jurisdiction is limited to correcting patent mistakes on the face of the record and does not permit rehearing of the concluded matter. No further relief was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>