<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 11 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271306</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing both appeals and affirming the appellant&#039;s liability to pay the special additional duty in accordance with subsection (1) of Section 3A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1974. The judgment was pronounced on 16.10.2015, settling the dispute regarding the classification and duty payment on the imported goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 May 2016 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 11 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271306</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing both appeals and affirming the appellant&#039;s liability to pay the special additional duty in accordance with subsection (1) of Section 3A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1974. The judgment was pronounced on 16.10.2015, settling the dispute regarding the classification and duty payment on the imported goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>