<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 5 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271300</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petitions, quashed the assessment orders levying tax on Rubber Process Oil, and directed authorities to reconsider the matter in accordance with the law. The court held that the Commissioner&#039;s classification was unjustified and not based on factual evidence, emphasizing the importance of accurate classification for tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 10:09:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 5 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271300</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petitions, quashed the assessment orders levying tax on Rubber Process Oil, and directed authorities to reconsider the matter in accordance with the law. The court held that the Commissioner&#039;s classification was unjustified and not based on factual evidence, emphasizing the importance of accurate classification for tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>