<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 3 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271298</link>
    <description>The Court approved and sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between AMIL Enterprises Private Limited and Honeyvick Enterprises Private Limited. Compliance with regulatory guidelines, including SEBI and RBI guidelines, was confirmed. The Court corrected a typing error in the order and emphasized upholding statutory liabilities post-sanction. Finding the Scheme genuine and in the interest of stakeholders, the Court directed payment of legal representatives&#039; fees by the Transferee Company. The issuance of drawn-up orders was waived, instructing relevant authorities to act on an authenticated copy of the order within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 10:09:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 3 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271298</link>
      <description>The Court approved and sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between AMIL Enterprises Private Limited and Honeyvick Enterprises Private Limited. Compliance with regulatory guidelines, including SEBI and RBI guidelines, was confirmed. The Court corrected a typing error in the order and emphasized upholding statutory liabilities post-sanction. Finding the Scheme genuine and in the interest of stakeholders, the Court directed payment of legal representatives&#039; fees by the Transferee Company. The issuance of drawn-up orders was waived, instructing relevant authorities to act on an authenticated copy of the order within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>