<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 737 - ITAT BANGLORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178294</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal in part for an Apex Cooperative bank, permitting the expenditure claimed towards the Co-operative Education Fund but remitted the matter back to the CIT(A) for reconsideration regarding other fund contributions, as the CIT(A) failed to adequately address the assessee&#039;s contentions. The disallowance of expenditure was upheld for contributions deemed not wholly and exclusively for the banking business, considered capital in nature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 17:49:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 737 - ITAT BANGLORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178294</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal in part for an Apex Cooperative bank, permitting the expenditure claimed towards the Co-operative Education Fund but remitted the matter back to the CIT(A) for reconsideration regarding other fund contributions, as the CIT(A) failed to adequately address the assessee&#039;s contentions. The disallowance of expenditure was upheld for contributions deemed not wholly and exclusively for the banking business, considered capital in nature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>