https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178285 The majority judgment in the case found Clause 4(x) of the Motor Vehicles (New High Security Vehicle Registration Plates) Order, 2001, and the eligibility conditions in the Notice Inviting Tenders (NITs) issued by State Governments to be invalid. These provisions were deemed to violate the fundamental right to trade under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution and were held to be ultra vires the powers conferred by Section 109(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act. The dissenting judgment referred the matter to a larger bench for further consideration due to a disagreement with the majority opinion. en-us Wed, 26 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Feb 2016 16:16:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178285 The majority judgment in the case found Clause 4(x) of the Motor Vehicles (New High Security Vehicle Registration Plates) Order, 2001, and the eligibility conditions in the Notice Inviting Tenders (NITs) issued by State Governments to be invalid. These provisions were deemed to violate the fundamental right to trade under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution and were held to be ultra vires the powers conferred by Section 109(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act. The dissenting judgment referred the matter to a larger bench for further consideration due to a disagreement with the majority opinion. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178285