<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 945 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178281</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in connection with the deduction claimed under section 80HHD for assessment years 2000-01 and 2001-02. The exclusion of disclaimed foreign exchange receipts for computing the deduction was accepted, and the inclusion of interest income in business income for the deduction was considered a debatable issue. The Court found no basis for imposing the penalty as the assessee&#039;s claim was deemed bona fide and not warranting penalty under section 271(1)(c). The appeals were dismissed, with no interference warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 15:42:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 945 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178281</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in connection with the deduction claimed under section 80HHD for assessment years 2000-01 and 2001-02. The exclusion of disclaimed foreign exchange receipts for computing the deduction was accepted, and the inclusion of interest income in business income for the deduction was considered a debatable issue. The Court found no basis for imposing the penalty as the assessee&#039;s claim was deemed bona fide and not warranting penalty under section 271(1)(c). The appeals were dismissed, with no interference warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>