<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 1 -  HIGH COURT , DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2124</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against the Assessee Trust in a case concerning the interpretation of Section 11(2) applicability, deduction of accumulated trust funds under Section 11(2), and treatment of a sum as application of income or loan. The Court disagreed with the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation, finding that the accumulated amount was not invested in accordance with Section 11(2)(b). Additionally, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding the deduction of accumulated funds, stating that the deposit made in 1976 did not fulfill the investment requirement for the relevant assessment year. However, the Court sided with the Assessee on the treatment of a specific sum as an application of income, emphasizing a broad interpretation of the term &quot;application&quot; in line with the Trust&#039;s objectives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 1 -  HIGH COURT , DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2124</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against the Assessee Trust in a case concerning the interpretation of Section 11(2) applicability, deduction of accumulated trust funds under Section 11(2), and treatment of a sum as application of income or loan. The Court disagreed with the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation, finding that the accumulated amount was not invested in accordance with Section 11(2)(b). Additionally, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding the deduction of accumulated funds, stating that the deposit made in 1976 did not fulfill the investment requirement for the relevant assessment year. However, the Court sided with the Assessee on the treatment of a specific sum as an application of income, emphasizing a broad interpretation of the term &quot;application&quot; in line with the Trust&#039;s objectives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>