<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1934 (6) TMI 29 - LAHORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178262</link>
    <description>A statutory tax return must be in the prescribed form, verified as required, and set forth total income; omissions or substantive non compliance convert the submission into an invalid return. The described defects - income figures qualified by &quot;about&quot;, omission of the period in the verification, and failure to supply Note 5(a) mercantile system details - were held to affect the character of the filing so it could not be treated as a valid return. Consequently the filing may be treated as no return for assessment purposes, enabling assessment under the Act&#039;s default provisions and exposing the filer to penalties including prosecution for false returns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 1934 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 12:22:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1934 (6) TMI 29 - LAHORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178262</link>
      <description>A statutory tax return must be in the prescribed form, verified as required, and set forth total income; omissions or substantive non compliance convert the submission into an invalid return. The described defects - income figures qualified by &quot;about&quot;, omission of the period in the verification, and failure to supply Note 5(a) mercantile system details - were held to affect the character of the filing so it could not be treated as a valid return. Consequently the filing may be treated as no return for assessment purposes, enabling assessment under the Act&#039;s default provisions and exposing the filer to penalties including prosecution for false returns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 1934 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>