<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1061 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178247</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, manufacturers of Pan masala and Gutkha, based on the interpretation of Pan masala Packing Machine Rules and penalty imposition. The Tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalty imposed by the Commissioner, aligning with a previous judgment. The High Court directed the Tribunal to dispose of the appeal within 6 months, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant and demonstrating consistency in legal interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 10:22:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1061 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178247</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, manufacturers of Pan masala and Gutkha, based on the interpretation of Pan masala Packing Machine Rules and penalty imposition. The Tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalty imposed by the Commissioner, aligning with a previous judgment. The High Court directed the Tribunal to dispose of the appeal within 6 months, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant and demonstrating consistency in legal interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>