<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1074 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271282</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in part, directing the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 1,30,00,000 based on seized papers as they were related to another entity. The Tribunal also ordered a thorough inquiry into the remaining alleged cash amount received. The decision favored the assessee by emphasizing the lack of justification for the initial addition and the necessity for further investigation into the remaining amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2016 23:14:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1074 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271282</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in part, directing the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 1,30,00,000 based on seized papers as they were related to another entity. The Tribunal also ordered a thorough inquiry into the remaining alleged cash amount received. The decision favored the assessee by emphasizing the lack of justification for the initial addition and the necessity for further investigation into the remaining amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>